08-09-2006, 09:09 PM
UnknownH Wrote:Can I say somethings honestly?
F the kiddy image some people say nintendo has. I don't give a SH.
This isn't something that I feel is particularly debatable. The plethora of kiddy games means that, aside from the games I'd buy for the system, I'd barely ever rent anything to try out until I had children. At least the PS2 attempts for a wide range of age diversity.
Quote:F the idea that graphics are the most important thing.
I don't think anyone's said that in this thread, yet. I'm pretty sure we're all smart enough here to know that a game with pretty graphics and no gameplay goes just about nowhere.
Quote:F the whole thing about the N64 being cartidge based.
The cartridge thing was fine with just about everyone. It was back in the day when the PS loading times were extraordinarily slow. People thought it was a cool idea.
Quote:F the fact that good game have to be M rated or that nintendo may not have many of them. I don't care.
You shouldn't put words in peoples' mouths. I don't want to play E rated games because the learning curve is so flat I could probably play them while catatonic. It just so happens that in addition to dealing with content I enjoy (MGS, Syphon Filter, RE, DMC, FF, etc), they could actually be considered challenging to play, and none are rated E. The ESRB ratings are a handy barometer to gauge difficulty as well as thematic content. So you don't care that your system of choice doesn't release some good games because of their rating? When has rating ever been an issue besides the GTSA Hot Coffee issue?
Quote:I think I got all of them but my point is I started playing games back when nintendo brought back from the crash, and I've played nintendo/sega games all my life and my second choice for a console would be a PS2.
It's all about choice. Everyone always thinks they made the best one. And everyone always tries to sway everyone else to their cause :p