(05-20-2009 06:45 AM)DragonMasterX Wrote: lol, no. All I care about is never having to see such thing.Well since when do you care about the anatomy that much than to base things you think don't exist? I mean seriously theres male burgermons and female burgermons. And there's angemon and angewomon. So what's your point? Why are relying the physics of what the exact same point rather than the opposite?
Quote:Never said I'd like them to be more into muscles. All I said was that, in my own oppinion, seeing a female Leomon would imply it being muscle-bound due to the anatomical structure of an original male version like seen in the series. If you, however, choose to draw a slender lion girl using Leomon's unique wardrobe, then that would make said character a cosplayer by natural standard.Well that's YOUR opinion, there's no facts there's a leomon that leomon would still retain a muscular psyique as if it were female. I generally think a female leomon would still retain a strength of a male but don't have too much of a muscles. I seen through pictures that a beastly girl would not retain a males physique in any other way besides some do in reality. I don't think it would be a cosplay an either way wither you like it or not.
Besides, why is it such a big deal if I don't consider a slender lion girl with pants a F-Leomon?
I'm more active in FA and DA now. Click here to look at my gallery!