Join our server on Discord

Which Holy Beasts looks like a girl?
#11
Lucemon Satan Mode is the creation of the writers from Digimon Frontier. And unless they pull another digimon from their ass (which I actually suspect they will), he's the final opponent of the series. Bandai had no part in his creation, they're only making the cards and toys based off Toei's designs.

Lucemon Satan Mode and Lucemon Falldown Mode are very problematic as unlike Dukemon and Imperial Dramon whose body just changes with minor power up, Lucemon's mode changes are full evolutionary steps. Which completely contradicts Toei's previous statements on what a mode change is. Hell, according to Toei, what mode change is supposed to be is closer to slide evolution, but that's 'completely different.'

Oh, and Imperial Dramon and Imperial Dramon Fighter Mode is still the closest in what a mode change is supposed to be. Fighter Mode is quiet litterally a transforming in a style similar to Transformers of the dragon into a warrior, which is not an evolution. All it is, is the relocation of certain parts of the dragon. The head swinging down to reveal a smaller human head. The armor on the forelegs moving around to become arms. The hind legs straightening out into humanoid legs. Wings being swept back and lasar canon moving from back to forearm. That's it. The changes are supposedly cosmetic. There shouldn't be a power-up, but a change in how to conduct battle.
Reply
#12
Lucemon Falldown Mode

I quite concur with you on all points, Lord Archive.

I wish they still had the names they were supposed to have - Apollymon for Falldown Mode and Behemon for Satan Mode. A fallen angel being transformed into a bestial demon is such a cool idea.

What a shame.
Reply
#13
well, that's what happens when Angels go bad. Look at Lucifer (which, believe it or not, is WHOM Lucemon is somewhat based off of... since both were Angels, but became corrupt and turned into demons)
Reply
#14
*Has un-hindered pics of both Satan and Falldown modes*

Anyone seen Lucemons Fresh and Intraining states? i have. :P
Reply
#15
I think the four are male.

But a female Baihumon or Zhuqiaomon why not ^.^
Reply
#16
Tiamat Wrote:I think the four are male.

But a female Baihumon or Zhuqiaomon why not ^.^

Ah, Tiamat, it's already been explained that the four gods are most definately males. And second, just having Baihumon or Zhuqiaomon be female for no reason would be on par with writing a story and making Jesus Christ a girl. Bai Hu and Zhu Qiao are gods in a few different religions, but are best known by their Shinto names of Byako and Suzaku. There are millions of people who believe these gods are real, and it would insult some of them to say 'Baihumon is a girl because I said so' as Baihumon is based one of their gods.

Technically, having Huanglongmon act like a roman god and turn one of the four gods into a girl may be out of character for the religion and could be seen as an insult as well. I'm not very well versed in Eastern religions. ^^; I know a little bit of the four directional guardian gods, but not the center god.

Then again, Toei has insulted Greek and Norse mythology by making Sylphimon and Valkyrimon male. Both are very much female only in their respective religions.
Reply
#17
Oh I see.

Then I will not change anything.

May be I will add another assistant: Magnadramon.


Reply
#18
Actually, if you want to assign lovers to the Digital Gods, Holy Dramon (Mangadramon) works well with Quinglongmon (Azulongmon) and Hououmon (Pheonixmon) with Zhuqiaomon.

Not sure about Xaunwumon or Baihumon, though. They're both bigger than most digimon of similar type to them. Maybe a female Vikmon for Xaunwumon, but Baihumon would really hurt a female Mihiramon unless he shrank himself to an appropriate size.
Reply
#19
Thanks.
I think it's very difficult to describe the making love scenes for the Holy Beasts because:

1) They have no hands. Thus cannot caress or hug.
2) They are too huge. It would be called distension (I think).
3) It's diff to imagine the location of their pecker except Baihumon.


Reply
#20
1) Just because they don't have hands doesn't mean they can't caress someone they care for. They just can't do it in a human fasion. They can rub their body against their mate, nuzzle her gently with their head. Qinglongmon would hug with his whole body, Baihumon can wrap his fore claws around his mate, and Zhuqiaomon can use his wings. Xuanwumon is out of luck in terms of hugging, but he could be hugged.

2) The Digital Gods may be huge, but nothing says they don't have the power to make themselves smaller. The gods they are based off of did have human avatar forms. (Which you may actually want to use. Just remember to use the predominate color scheme of their bodies as their clothes and hair.)

3) The main issue of Digimon is would they have a uniform means of reproduction so they can breed with completely different types.

Well, assuming that the Internet did contribute to the formation of the Digital World, it would be probably that all the porn sites produced uniform human like sexes for all types of digimon, even if certain digimon, like Tortomon should not have anything resembling a penis even if male.

That out of the way, continuing in a uniform and computer like analitical thought on such things, the penis and cunt would be located somewhere between the (hind) legs or where such appendages would be located. Unlike the Star Trek quote, the privates would all be kept in roughly the same place.

As long as Qinglongmon is, he does have hind legs and his penis would be between there. A female Holy Dramon would have her pussy in a similar position. This basically restricts that their sexes must be flush together, but they can do things with the rest of their body, like coil around each other.

Zhuqiaomon would likely be further back on his body, closer to his tail feathers. This is mainly so he can mount his mate from above like most birds do. A female bird-like digimon would fold up her tail feathers against her back, so as not to get in the way of her mate as her cunt would be just below them.
Reply