Of sex scenes and storytelling

[Anonmon]

I accept it as a theory in the same way that Intelligent Design is a theory. However, the burden of proof for it lies on you.

[MISTER BIG T]

Given your source, I'm going to call bullshit.

I had sex with a woman and she orgasmed (Because I'm that hardcore) which caused the entire bed, the sheets, my balls, and everything get so drenched in juices I thought someone had sprayed water at us. True story.

[UnknownH]

If I haven't seen something like that before, I wouldn't belive it.

[Anonmon]

Given your source, I'm going to call bullshit.

I had sex with a woman and she orgasmed (Because I'm that hardcore) which caused the entire bed, the sheets, my balls, and everything get so drenched in juices I thought someone had sprayed water at us. True story.

What does that have to do with my post? I responded to Nate Hunter's claim that men lose cognitive functions while having sex.

[Nate Hunter]

I didn't say they lose it, but that they are less inclined to use it as they enter a more instinctive state:

I'm not saying men never communicate in bed and women always do, or that either gender wants to always be that way. I'm just saying that generally speaking, because of how the sexual experience affects our minds, men are less likely to communicate in a complicated fashion than women are. Men tend to revert in their mental action to a more primal or basic state of mind, and thus may lose a lot of sweet talk capacity while making love, whether with another man or a woman.

I said that we enter a more primal or basic state. How many men here could support that their rationality and desire to speak tend to decrease when having sex or masturbating? Sexual activity is, after all, sexual activity. I may WANT to say things but it's difficult for me to focus on expressing them when I wank off, and even in the dreams I do remember I don't talk alot during intercourse, even with what I may WANT to say.

It's known that women often feminize the men they write, we can't argue that part. Women write ment o be more emotional, or at least more in tune with and expressive of their emotions, than most men tend to actually be.

If a woman can change mortal enemies like Wolverine and Sabertooth (Marvel Comics) into two mushy young men whose thoughts turn to romancewhen they touch, and then claim they only fight for the particularly masculine reason of being afraid of being gay, but deep down they are deeply in love and want to kiss and touch and. . . be gay lovers with each other, I think that shows us something about that woman: She's being torn between the sweet and stable desires of finding a child-rearing mate, as well as the innate and primal desires of finding the best genes for her offspring. As a result, she's applying all the more feminine and softer traits of the ideal husband to the physical traits of an ideal mate. In short, she is FEMINIZING both Wolverine and Sabertooth into some sort of "Stepford Mate" with the personality of a husband and the body of a mate. He acts more like a woman, which she views as being dependable and loyal and a good influence on her children, because she makes him more feminine.

So why can't we assume that they do the same thing in their sexual behaviour with or without a scientific study. Think of how males are generally portrayed in sex: They grunt, moan, sigh, and revert to largely monosyllabic words, usually in short and simple sentences. "That's good", "Right there", "I'm coming" (yes, I know "coming" is two syllables).

Women I've noticed tend to write more discussion into sex. Women tend to be written in as either the porn-star/slut who acts little differently from a man, or as the romantic who wants deeper meaning from the relationship and the sex, and want to talk.

Most porn is written by men and focuses on men with the more masculine females -- women who aren't that much more expressive during sex than the men. A man's ideal mate, in a sense, who doesn't want to talk afterwards (or during sex), and who just lies there with her man in bed when it's over. This is probably because of a fundamental difference in our brain chemistry, which science has shown in an irrefutable fact, and how it responds to the sexual acts and the hormones our bodies produce during it.

[DigistarDBZ]

You know what? This was incredibly enlightening, and I think I'll be viewing how I read and write these kinds of stories with these tips and realities in mind from now on. It's definately a wake-up call for those of us who don't realize we're just not portraying sex as it actually is.

Thank you for posting these! :)

[Wisemon]

If a woman can change mortal enemies like Wolverine and Sabertooth (Marvel Comics) into two mushy young men whose thoughts turn to romancewhen they touch, and then claim they only fight for the particularly masculine reason of being afraid of being gay, but deep down they are deeply in love and want to kiss and touch and. . . be gay lovers with each other, I think that shows us something

Who the hell wrote that? That shows misunderstanding.

[UnknownH]

I thinnk it could be hypothetical. But either way, it's disturbing. And it grosses me out a little.

[Nate Hunter]

If a woman can change mortal enemies like Wolverine and Sabertooth (Marvel Comics) into two mushy young men whose thoughts turn to romance when they touch, and then claim they only fight for the particularly masculine reason of being afraid of being gay, but deep down they are deeply in love and want to kiss and touch and. . . be gay lovers with each other, I think that shows us something

Who the hell wrote that? That shows misunderstanding.

I don't even remember anymore, but it burned me to read it. And to see the pictures too.

[Master Grim]

*reads through own lemons* Hey... you have a really good point, Herr Mullen... No matter how I try to make these scenes turn out they always end up in a huge block... Damn...