05-14-2003, 02:07 AM
nr2 .. YESH for nr2 quickly shows the entire pic so you can see if you want to see it or not :P the link only can link you to just about anything .. and the cutout is not clear enough so ... I go for 2 :P
| Poll: How do you prefer to view image galleries? (view post for help) You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| 1. Text only (faster page loading and less bandwidth used) | 2 | 12.50% | |
| 2. to-scale thumbnails (thumbnails show width and hight of image, scaled down, best quality) | 4 | 25.00% | |
| 3. 100x100 resized images (easyest thumb to make, but lower quality) | 2 | 12.50% | |
| 4. 100x100 image cut-out (cut out thumbnail of the origenal pic) | 8 | 50.00% | |
| Total | 16 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
How do you perfer to view image gallerys?
|
|
05-14-2003, 04:26 AM
I voted for number 2 when this vote started, thinking just what elvarien thought. Plus I kept in mind that the cutout requires thinking for each picture, selecting a representative cutout of each and every pic in a gallery.
But if done well, the cutout solution would have a couple of advantages. First of all the fact that you wouldn't get a cramped thumbnail. Esp. pics with extreme height/width proportions look really crappy when sized down to a bearable thumbnail level. Then there is the optical factor. Thumbnails of the same size mean neat, clean, and fast-loading galleries that look a tad more professional than other galleries.
05-15-2003, 07:32 AM
Well, the cutout looks best, but on many pictures, you won't get the point *g*
I'll go with number three :D |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|