Join our server on Discord

Digimon ending?....no way!
#11
they should have left Digimon on ABC family thats all i gotta say cause on the weekdays before i would get to see some Digimon 01 and 02 and Tamers


they screwed up by moving digimon to upn and now it's all down hill

i say put digimon back on ABC family with the classic 01 episodes

Biyomon:and help us regain our popularity
Reply
#12
Renafan, check out my site *url bellow* if you like it you are more than welcome to post your lemons on my site. I am looking for more authors so actually I'm begging you to post your lemons.

Contact me via email or any of the 4 IMs I got.
Reply
#13
Digimon, after Frontier, should split into two lil categories...The normal Digimon still for kids...And the X-Rated one!!...>_
Reply
#14
Yeah, too bad that will never happen.... Well, I beieve that Digimon will continue. As for the X-Rated version, I wouldn't hold my breath, but I am crossing my fingers anyway. ^^;
Reply
#15
I think X-Rated means more violent, same as Street Fighter anime.
Currently we couldn't see any blood scenes on Digimon series... :D


Reply
#16
No Ruhe... that'd be a PG-13 or R-rating...

X-Rated woul have sex (It's also known a NC-17)
Reply
#17
Oh I see.
This mean we could see Davis/Kari or VeeGato. And the ending would show their weddings. And even pregnancy and how they born (give birth) babies.


Reply
#18
uhh... not sure about that last one (that'd be something you'd see on The Learning Channel in the US).
Reply
#19
oh hell no!Daisuke is not getting Takeru's wife Hikari!

and Patamon will never let Gatomon get raped by Veemon!

*supports Takari and Patagato*
Reply
#20
I'd really appreciate it if you kept your opinions to yourself, Chibi, when it comes to a matter of that sort. You are not to judge the plausibility of pairings and openly declare that Davis/Kari and Veemon/Gatomon could never work. The two above pairings at least include a one-sided crush, which is a canon basis that TK/Kari (outside of TK's Season 02 theme) and Patamon/Gatomon do not have.

I am not trying to be mean, just stating that I really dislike such an approach to this subject.
Reply