Love with a digimon,beastiality or not?

[DragonMasterX]

Those aren't evolved at the scale we have, and they are funny to watch.

[Shadowknight]

What would the world be like if we couldn't make fun of inferior beings.

[Master Grim]

Another characteristic of a living organism, however, is a lifespan. Left to their own devices, Digimon do not 'grow old'...

:? I've always wondered about that...

[Guilmon and a shotgun]

nobody knows and yet....not many care!!!!(like me)


oh on a personal note who thinks mission impossable should adopt the exorcist theme tune?

[Master Grim]

NO!!!

Ahem... Sorry about that. I just really like the MI theme tune!

[Guilmon and a shotgun]

well the exorcist is alot better
the kind of music u play when snipering enemy troops

[DragonMasterX]

Okay, enough. We were talking something about monkeys and you start talking about MI movie music? Guilmon, hold yourself please.

[Master Grim]

Monkeys? *shakes head* You must really be running out of things to talk about...

[DragonMasterX]

Not really, it seems you don't even pay attention to what we talk about.

Animal:
-Survive by consuming other organisms
-Multicellular
-Perform sexual reproduction
-Responsive to their environment
-Capable of locomotion (movement)
-Can process pain

Digimon can do all the things listed above, so, according to science, they are animals.

Bestiality: Human/animal sexual activity

So, assuming that Digimon are indeed animals, in the scientific sense, mating with them WOULD be considered bestiality. But, the thing to debate here is this; are Digimon animals, as in are they living organisms?

Another characteristic of a living organism, however, is a lifespan. Left to their own devices, Digimon do not 'grow old'. Therefore, their valididity as being animals is challenged, despite the scientific evidence pointing towards their existence as living, breathing animal organisms.

In the Digital world, where they exist entirely as data, they're biometrical aspect is lost (if it ever existed). In the real world, however, it is debatable whether or not their existence is that of a living organism or a self-sufficient, operational program that is capable of running ethical, conversational and generally HUMAN subroutines that can be operated, run and executed by the source Digimon.

However, another piece of evidence against the organismal existence of Digimon in the real world is the way they are destroyed; they leave no residue or trace of their existence once they are destroyed (although they re-spawn in eggs back in the Digital world, perhaps insinuating that the data travels back to the Digital world from the real world when they are destroyed there). To be an organism, you must be able to be broken down into elemental units of matter; their destruction implies an existence of electromagnetic origins.

My conclusion, therefore, is that mating with Digimon in the Digital world is DEFINATELY not bestiality, but in the real world there is evidence pointing either way, but I say that it isn't.

He did a very good post, pointing a very good point too, and Guilmon asked a question:

does this mean that we are in fact animals because we do most of these things?

Which I responded with:

Yep. I think so, but also I think humans are animals because of Darwin's Natural Choice Theory. The Astrolopithecus (sorry if mispelt) is our ancient form, and it was like a monkey; a monkey that evolved into various other advanced forms until what we are now, the Homo Sapiens. So technically, we are animals. Yay, I'm a beast with a reason.

So I was actually following some reasons to consider if men itself is an animal. And since we are talking about bestiality, which is the intercourse between animals and men, then we really didn't go off topic. The ones off topic were you and Guilmon.

[Guilmon and a shotgun]

Me: i made a personal note then pokepimp here became a drama queen about the mission impossable theme :roll: