05-05-2016, 11:53 PM
Well, some of my friends said:
Zach Snyder is a Director who liked to force you to accept what he produced.
In Man of Steel, he forced us to accept Superman is a dark-side hero. He wears his red underwear inside. He kills enemy. As a result, many ppl disliked this movie. It was not a bad movie, but it was too weird compared to the 80's Superman 1 to 3.
But Batman Begins was damn good. Although the Director produced a brand new Batman (different from the 80's), most ppl accepted the new characters (Joker, Batman) without much complains. This Director can do a good re-boot (Batman) but Zach Snyder can't (Superman).
The main problem in S vs B is: Character inconsistency.
OMG! This is Lex Luthor? This is Batman? This is Superman?
In Civil War, all characters are same from the beginning. Spiderman and Ant Man are full of humour, the Director did not give us a serious-type Spiderman or a poker-face Antman.
Zach Snyder is a Director who liked to force you to accept what he produced.
In Man of Steel, he forced us to accept Superman is a dark-side hero. He wears his red underwear inside. He kills enemy. As a result, many ppl disliked this movie. It was not a bad movie, but it was too weird compared to the 80's Superman 1 to 3.
But Batman Begins was damn good. Although the Director produced a brand new Batman (different from the 80's), most ppl accepted the new characters (Joker, Batman) without much complains. This Director can do a good re-boot (Batman) but Zach Snyder can't (Superman).
The main problem in S vs B is: Character inconsistency.
OMG! This is Lex Luthor? This is Batman? This is Superman?
In Civil War, all characters are same from the beginning. Spiderman and Ant Man are full of humour, the Director did not give us a serious-type Spiderman or a poker-face Antman.
![[Image: Renamon2.jpg]](http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y79/floramon/Renamon2.jpg)