Love with a digimon,beastiality or not?

[Guilmon and a shotgun]

mon= monster! :shock:
monster=beast sex with a digimon=beastly sex :)

its as simple as that

Monster != beast

Thus your attempt at logic is broken. Because one definition of the word "monster" is "an inhumanly cruel or wicked person", you are incorrect to say that "mon=monster=beast" and even more incorrect to follow your premise to its conclusion.

The fact that another definition of the same word is "a thing that is excessively or dauntingly large", and can even then refer to an inanimate object furthers weakens your argument. And thus is Monster != beast, but can also be anything living or non-living, sex with a monster cannot in and of itself be called bestiality.

The line between bestiality and not is rather fine when you deal with anthropomorphic characters. I contend that if the character is humanoid in form, regardless how zoomorphic that shape may be, and is not simply an exaggerated shaping of an animal (as in The Island of Dr. Moreau), I will assume that through the showing of appropriate intellectual and emotional capacity (generally speaking, independent speech and the capacity to show emotions; most Disney or Warner anthropomorphic characters show both of these) then it is no longer bestiality, but a furry fetish. Of course, my definition of anthropomorphization isn't simply in the body, but primarily in the character. There are a wide variety of body types, even ones that we've yet to imagine or see, but I think to me the line is three points...

(1) Form -- what is their shape like, and how does it match to the human form? In what ways is it alike, and in what ways different?

(2) Development -- how intellectually capable are they? are they able to make fire (exceptions to undersea peoples)? are they able to speak and/or read/write? are they able to discuss philosophy? metaphysics?

(3) Connection -- do they make emotional connections? do they make physical connections? do they associate sex as physical or emotional, or both?

If one can positively answer in all of those that this is just having sex with a human in a different shape, then I wouldn't object.

its true logic though digimon are in fact digital monsters am i correct?
also they don't all behave like wicked cruel humans/creatures
and monsters could be dragons,centaursect yet they are classed as beasts or mythical creatures!!!
(i am of corse excluding renamon when she beats the crap out of me)