08-09-2005, 02:14 AM
I'm afraid you fell straight into your flamer's intent: to anger you.
I consider there is only one appropriate way to respond to flames: mock it. You can always pointedly ignore it, but that's not really response.
Frankly, I'd be delighted if someone wasted the time to write such a flame for me, because it's such a great to entertain yourself than to write a long detailed woprd-for-word explanation of why such a statement is ridiculous.
Otherwise, I'd like to mention I've personally greatly appreciated several of your lemons (Though it's been a heck of a long time since I've browsed by affNET).
I consider there is only one appropriate way to respond to flames: mock it. You can always pointedly ignore it, but that's not really response.
Frankly, I'd be delighted if someone wasted the time to write such a flame for me, because it's such a great to entertain yourself than to write a long detailed woprd-for-word explanation of why such a statement is ridiculous.
Otherwise, I'd like to mention I've personally greatly appreciated several of your lemons (Though it's been a heck of a long time since I've browsed by affNET).