Furry-based D&D?

[DragonMasterX]

BRAVEHEARTS/DRAGONESSES:
Actually that happens a lot in war where an extremely few number takes on a lot and takes down a decent number. Nextly, Dragonesses does have males in it and that leads into my point that they are not ungodly powerful dragons, if you read my description of dragonesses and actually thought about it you'd realize a good big of the soldiers use AXES, which is guess what? Even with speed fairly easy to break or dodge. Also, I never said they weren't flipping elites or if any of the bravehearts (being a nickname for the race not the race's actual name) were NATURALLY that strong. Please read carefully next time.

lol, I for one took the time to fully read what you posted and even quoted the key points of my disagreements. I bolded your critical speech up there, and here's two things I need you to know:

First of all, use whatever name you want, I'm just telling you that by adding 'ness' in the word "dragon" you are implying they are female, not male. This example is found in other animals as well, a good one is "Tiger" that when female is named "Tigress". The 'ess' is probably a suffix added to remark the gender. Don't you think so as well?

Second of all, I don't really agree with your statement on armies, especially when you're stating that the "Dragonesses" can swing giant weapons like sticks (Insanely fast, unless we're not speaking of the wooden sticks one might find on the ground next to a tree), which would even up the "one hand pwn" mastery you gave to the "Bravehearts" if at least a bit. Thus, your 7000 vs. 200 = 800 left is still over-exageratted and is easily implying how 'uber'-powerful the BraveHeart class is. And that is why I'm saying it's not a class that would prove to be any interesting unless your goal is not to play a challenging game. I'm guessing people wanna have fun evenly, but at the same time with their own individual choice of a self-representation in the game, not be shadowed by a class that can take out 30 enemies with such ease.