12-22-2006, 03:27 AM
You don't read the entire article do you?
The report states that a Rabbi wanted to place a menorah WITH the other holiday decorations:
That's when he had threatened to sue. Since his lawyer nor the airport could reach an agreement over the lawsuit, the Airport themselves chose to take down all the decorations, not the Rabbi.
And another quote:
The Rabbi didn't want to take them down, THE AIRPORT DID, not the man who wanted just a menora added to the decorations.
So no it wasn't from the complaint, but from the incompotent morons who run the airport.
So no it doesn't support your statement one bit, only to disprove that its the whiner's fault that people take stuff down.
-> And of course this article is semi-biased based on the opening of the entire article.
The report states that a Rabbi wanted to place a menorah WITH the other holiday decorations:
Quote:"At first we got a light yes, then we got a strong no," he said.
That's when he had threatened to sue. Since his lawyer nor the airport could reach an agreement over the lawsuit, the Airport themselves chose to take down all the decorations, not the Rabbi.
And another quote:
Quote:But the rabbi says he hopes the holiday spirit may still be saved, offenses mended and the trees returned to the front of the airport.
"Took them less than 24 hours to remove the Christmas trees, I'd hope they'd reinstall all those Christmas trees throughout the airport, and hopefully allow us to display the menorah," he said.
The Rabbi didn't want to take them down, THE AIRPORT DID, not the man who wanted just a menora added to the decorations.
So no it wasn't from the complaint, but from the incompotent morons who run the airport.
So no it doesn't support your statement one bit, only to disprove that its the whiner's fault that people take stuff down.
-> And of course this article is semi-biased based on the opening of the entire article.